Australian Property Market Update October 2025
Disclaimer: These are generated via AI – please note that you need to do your own due diligence and read the report yourself to make your own market decisions. This is simply a tool to assist you.
Core Logic Chart Pack
Check out the monthly report here.
Core Logic Chart Pack Overview
Check out the monthly report here.
Herron Todd White Monthly Report
Check out the monthly report here.
Herron Todd White Monthly Overview
Check out the monthly report here.
Need to get up to date market information?
Visit Real Estate Investar to conduct your research of on market properties and use our code a discount including access to Core Logic RPData for valuations and comparable sale data.
Transcript
Core Logic Chart Pack
0:00Welcome to the deep dive. We’ve got the
0:01sources in front of us. The uh the very
0:04latest Australian housing chart pack.
0:06This is fresh data October 2025. Yeah.
0:09And our job as always is to cut through
0:11it all and really map out for you what’s
0:13happening with Australian housing right
0:15now. We’re not just, you know, reading
0:16out numbers. We want to get under the
0:17skin of it, figure out where the
0:19momentum is really building and what’s
0:21actually driving it. And maybe the best
0:23place to start is with the sheer scale.
0:25We have to talk about the biggest
0:26number, don’t we?
0:27We really do. It’s uh it’s almost hard
0:29to comprehend sometimes. The total value
0:32of Australian residential real estate,
0:34it’s sitting at a massive 11.8 trillion.
0:37Wow. Okay, just let that sink in for
0:38you. 11.8 trillion. I mean, just to give
0:41you some context, that absolutely dwarfs
0:43Australian superanuation, that’s about
0:45$4.3 trillion.
0:46That’s right. And listed stocks uh
0:48around $3.6 trillion. So, yeah, housing
0:51is just enormous in comparison.
0:53It really is the bedrock of Australian
0:54wealth, isn’t it? It’s not just another
0:56asset.
0:56No, it underpins what? over half of all
0:59household wealth. So its performance
1:01really dictates how people feel, how
1:03confident they are, policy decisions. It
1:06touches everything. Affordability
1:08obviously is key.
1:09So with that massive scale in mind,
1:12what’s the latest pulse check? Is this
1:13giant market still growing or are things
1:16starting to cool off a bit?
1:18Well, the headline is definitely
1:19continued growth. Actually, it looks
1:20like there’s renewed momentum building.
1:22We’re seeing this confluence of factors
1:24really. You’ve got um the earlier
1:26interest rate setting sort of filtering
1:28through rising incomes helping a bit
1:30with borrowing and maybe most
1:31importantly just really tight stark
1:33levels very little for sale.
1:35Okay. So renewed momentum. What does
1:37that look like in the numbers?
1:38The core finding I’d say is the
1:40quarterly growth. National dwelling
1:41values jumped 2.2% over the 3 months to
1:44September. And what’s really telling is
1:47that 2.2% well it matches the biggest
1:49quarterly jump we’ve seen since back in
1:51May 2024. So the market’s definitely
1:54kicked up a gear again,
1:55right? So it’s accelerating.
1:56Yeah. And
1:56that acceleration must be pushing up the
1:58annual trend, too.
2:00Exactly. The annual growth figure is now
2:01running at 4.8% over the 12 months to
2:04September. So that upward trend is
2:06definitely firming up.
2:07Okay. 4.8% annual growth, 2.2%
2:10quarterly. But growth like this is never
2:12spread evenly, is it? Where’s the heat
2:14concentrated? Is it top-end mansions,
2:17entry-level apartments, or somewhere
2:19else?
2:19Yeah, good question. If you’re looking
2:21for sort of the engine room of this
2:24current growth phase,
2:25it seems to be right in the middle. The
2:27strongest quarterly pace, which was
2:28$2.5%, is really focused on that middle
2:31band of the market. We’re talking
2:32dwellings valued between, say, $648,000
2:35and $1.2 million nationally.
2:37Huh, that’s interesting. So maybe not
2:39the super wealthy pushing prices up or
2:41just first home buyers. It’s that middle
2:43bracket. Is that maybe the group getting
2:45the most benefit from, you know,
2:46borrowing capacity improving slightly,
2:49meeting that tight supply you mentioned?
2:50I think that’s a big part of it. Yeah,
2:52that price range often captures
2:53families, people looking to upgrade.
2:55They’ve likely been waiting, watching
2:57the market, and now with maybe a bit
3:00more borrowing power, meeting very few
3:02available homes in that bracket. You get
3:04that intense competition pushing values
3:06up, scarcity is really biting there.
3:09Makes sense. And what about the classic
3:11split capitals versus regions? Are the
3:14big cities still outperforming?
3:16They are, but maybe not by as much as
3:18you’d think. Over those 3 months to
3:19September, the combined capitals grew by
3:212.3%. The combined regionals were
3:24slightly behind at 1.8%. So capital’s
3:26still leading, but regionals holding up
3:28pretty well, too.
3:29And all this growth, this momentum,
3:31it happened even though the RBA kept the
3:33cash rate on hold at 3.6% in September.
3:36Right.
3:36That’s right. They held steady. Now,
3:38that decision itself wasn’t a huge
3:40surprise. It was widely expected. But
3:42what was notable was the language around
3:43it. The RBA definitely sounded a bit
3:45more uh hawkish, hinting that maybe
3:48rates could still go up or at least stay
3:50high for longer.
3:51Yeah, usually that kind of talk might
3:53cool things down a bit, make buyers
3:55nervous. So, why did the housing market
3:57seem to just shrug it off?
4:00Well, I think it comes back to that
4:01supply constraint we keep mentioning.
4:03It’s just incredibly powerful right now.
4:05buyers, especially maybe investors or
4:07owner occupiers who already have finance
4:09sorted, they see the fundamental
4:11problem, not enough homes. So, yes,
4:14maybe rates could rise further. That’s a
4:15risk. But the risk of missing out now
4:18when stock is so low probably feels more
4:20immediate, more tangible. The physical
4:22lack of housing is for now seemingly
4:25overriding the RBA’s signals.
4:27That’s a really key point. Supply
4:28basically trumps sentiment, at least for
4:30now. Okay, let’s zoom in because the
4:32national picture really breaks down when
4:34you look city by city, doesn’t it? Some
4:36huge differences in those quarterly
4:37figures. I mean, look at the front
4:38runners. Just incredible growth. Darwin
4:40up a massive 5.9% in just 3 months.
4:43Yeah, Darwin’s been exceptionally
4:45strong.
4:45And then Perth also flying high at 4.0%
4:48and Brisbane still very strong at 3.5%.
4:51These seem to be the real hot spots.
4:53Definitely the leaders right now. But
4:54then you contrast that with the other
4:56end of the scale. Melbourne only managed
4:581.0% 0% growth in the quarter and Hobart
5:01barely moved just.1%. So huge divergence
5:05there. You really see local factors at
5:07play.
5:08So for those booming cities like Perth
5:10and Darwin, are they now pushing into
5:12new record territory or just making up
5:15lost ground?
5:16Good question. For most of the country,
5:18it’s actually record highs. Sydney,
5:20Brisbane, Adelaide, Perth, and Darwin.
5:22Their dwelling values are all now above
5:24their previous picks from 2022. They’ve
5:26recovered and pushed on. Okay, so
5:28they’re in clear air. Yeah, but
5:29Melbourne and Hobart,
5:30yeah, they’re telling a different story.
5:31Melbourne is still lagging, actually
5:322.7% below its record high from way back
5:35in March 2022. Canra is similar. Still
5:38trying to recover about 4.0% below its
5:40May 2022 peak.
5:42But Hobart is the real outlier, isn’t
5:44it? Still down a huge 9.5% from its
5:46March 2022 peak. Why is it struggling so
5:50much? Was it just too overheated during
5:51the boom?
5:52I think that’s a large part of it.
5:54Hobart saw phenomenal growth during that
5:57pandemic boom, maybe pushed values
5:59beyond what local incomes could really
6:01sustain long term. So now with higher
6:04rates, the correction there is just
6:06taking longer. It shows how even in a
6:09national upswing, smaller markets can
6:11struggle with affordability and
6:13liquidity if they got overextended.
6:15And this split is even visible right
6:16down to the suburb level, isn’t it? The
6:18data showed some really extreme local
6:20movements.
6:21Absolutely. You mentioned Darwin
6:22earlier. Well, the suburbs with the
6:24highest growth recently, almost all in
6:25Darwin, places like Wangori, Durac,
6:27Molden, they were up over 18.9% just
6:31between February and September.
6:33Incredible numbers.
6:34Wow. And at the other end, where were
6:36the biggest drops?
6:37Interestingly, they were concentrated in
6:39some of those really expensive,
6:41typically blue chip suburbs in Sydney
6:43and Melbourne. So, think places like
6:44Kiraabilly or Milson’s Point in Sydney
6:46or Armadale Pron in Melbourne. Those saw
6:49the largest price drops. So that really
6:50reinforces the idea that affordability
6:53combined with that intense local
6:55scarcity in places like Darwin is
6:57driving growth in unexpected areas while
6:59the really premium maybe highly
7:01leveraged markets are still a bit
7:03sensitive
7:04precisely. It’s a fascinating micro
7:06dynamic playing out.
7:07Okay, so values are soaring in places
7:09like Darwin, but can buyers actually,
7:12you know, find anything to buy? What’s
7:14happening with sales activity?
7:15Well, overall activity is pretty solid.
7:17Nationally, we’re looking at about
7:18540,775
7:21sales annually, worth around $523.9
7:24billion. So, money is definitely
7:27changing hands. But just like the value
7:30growth, the sales volume picture varies
7:32wildly depending on where you look.
7:33Let me guess, Darwin again.
7:35You guessed it. Darwin sales volumes are
7:37up an incredible 60.1% compared to a
7:40year ago. Just shows the level of demand
7:42there.
7:4250%. Okay, that’s huge. Anywhere else
7:44seen strong sales growth.
7:45Camera is also doing well. sales up
7:4712.0% year-on-year. But then look at
7:49Sydney, the biggest market. Sales
7:50volumes there actually fell by 4.0%
7:53compared to last year,
7:54right? So that definitely confirms that
7:56shift in activity away from maybe the
7:58traditional powerhouses towards these
8:00smaller surging capitals.
8:02It certainly looks that way. Now, if we
8:04look at selling conditions like how long
8:06it takes to sell the power seems to be
8:07shifting back towards sellers, which
8:09usually points to low stock. Nationally,
8:12the median time a property spends on the
8:14market has actually crept up slightly
8:16year-on-year from 27 days to 30 days
8:19now.
8:19Okay. Slightly longer nationally.
8:21Yeah.
8:21But I bet that masks big differences.
8:23Absolutely. Back to Darwin, the median
8:26selling time there dropped
8:27significantly. It went from 51 days a
8:29year ago down to just 39 days now.
8:32That’s a massive drop. Things are
8:34selling much faster there, suggesting
8:35really strong competition among buyers.
8:37Exactly. And you see that confidence
8:39reflected in vendor discounting, too.
8:41Sellers aren’t having to drop their
8:43prices as much to get a deal done.
8:44Nationally, the average discount has
8:46shrunk a bit from 3.3% a year ago to
8:49negative 3.2% now. It’s a small change,
8:52but it shows sellers are feeling less
8:54pressure to negotiate. Demand is meeting
8:56asking prices more often.
8:58Okay, which brings us squarely to what
9:00feels like the most critical piece of
9:02this puzzle right now, supply, or rather
9:05the lack of it. How tight are listings?
9:08They are uh exceptionally tight. Let’s
9:10look at new listings first. The
9:12properties just coming onto the market.
9:14Over the four weeks leading up to early
9:15October, new listings were down 7.6%
9:18compared to the same time last year.
9:20Down 7.6% year-on-year.
9:22And maybe more importantly, they were
9:232.1% lower than the historical 5-year
9:26average for this time of year. So, fewer
9:28new properties are coming up for sale
9:29than usual. So, we’ve got rising prices,
9:31accelerating momentum, a growing
9:33population, and fewer new homes hitting
9:35the market. That sounds like a recipe
9:37for serious price pressure.
9:39It absolutely is. And it gets worse when
9:41you look at the total number of
9:42properties available for sale at any
9:44given time. Total stock levels across
9:46the country. Just 122,173
9:50properties observed for sale. That
9:51number is a huge 19.3%
9:54below the historic 5-year average for
9:56this time of year.
9:57Wow. nearly 20% below the average.
9:59That’s a massive shortfall in available
10:01homes.
10:01It is. And this isn’t just one or two
10:04cities dragging the average down. This
10:06inventory shortage is pretty much
10:08everywhere. Almost every capital city
10:10and regional market is seeing fewer
10:12total listings now compared to the
10:145-year average. The only exception seems
10:16to be regional Northern Territory.
10:18So, this chronic lack of choice for
10:21buyers,
10:22it must be feeding directly into those
10:24strong selling conditions you mentioned
10:25like auction results. Definitely auction
10:28clearance rates are a great real-time
10:30indicator of market heat. In the
10:31combined capital cities, clearance rates
10:33were averaging 69.8% in the four weeks
10:36to late September, almost 70%. That’s a
10:39strong number, showing that when
10:41properties do get listed, especially via
10:43auction, there’s often enough
10:44competition to get them sold quickly.
10:46Okay, so sales are happening, but
10:47against a backdrop of critically low
10:49supply. Let’s pivot slightly to the
10:51rental market, cuz if supply is this
10:53tight for buyers, it must be hitting
10:55renters hard, too. Oh, absolutely. The
10:57rental market squeeze is intense and
10:59unfortunately seems to be getting worse.
11:01Annual growth in rents nationally picked
11:03up again for the third month straight.
11:05It’s now running at 4.3%
11:08nationally over the year to September.
11:10And in the capitals, where the pressure
11:12is often highest,
11:13even higher there. Rents in the combined
11:15capitals are up 5.9% over the year. That
11:17pressure is just relentless for tenants.
11:19Nearly 6% annual rent growth in the
11:22capitals. Ouch. Was there any particular
11:25city where rental growth really
11:27accelerated recently?
11:28Yes, Brisbane stood out. Between the
11:30June and September quarters, the annual
11:32pace of rent growth there really jumped
11:34from 3.9% up to 5.6%. It just reflects
11:38that really strong demand story in
11:39Brisbane right now, driven by population
11:41growth, impacting both sales and
11:43rentals.
11:44So, rents are climbing steeply. What
11:45about rental yields for landlords? Are
11:47they keeping pace?
11:48Interestingly, national gross rent
11:50yields actually dipped slightly down to
11:523.65%. 65%.
11:54Oh, why is that? If rents are rising so
11:56fast,
11:56it’s simply because home values have
11:58generally been rising even faster than
12:00rents recently. So, as a percentage of
12:02the property’s value, the rent return
12:04ticked down just a tiny bit. Capital
12:06gains are still really dominating the
12:08financial returns for owners right now.
12:10Right. Okay. So, the supply crunch is
12:12hitting buyers and renters. Now, what
12:15about the future? Are we building enough
12:17homes to ease this pressure down the
12:19track? Let’s look at approvals. Ah,
12:22approvals. Well, this is where the
12:23picture gets frankly quite concerning
12:25for the longer term. New dwelling
12:28approvals, they’re consistently running
12:30below the decade average. That average
12:33is around 16,700 approvals per month.
12:36And we’re below that.
12:37Yes. And not just dipping below
12:39occasionally. We’ve been below that
12:40decade average for seven out of the last
12:42eight months this year. It’s a
12:44persistent shortfall.
12:45That sounds like we’re just not building
12:46anywhere near enough to keep up with
12:48population growth, let alone address the
12:50backlog. That’s exactly the concern. And
12:52it’s particularly bad when you look at
12:54unit approvals, apartments, town houses,
12:56the higher density stuff we really need
12:58in cities. Unit approvals actually
13:00dropped significantly in August, down
13:0210.6% in just one month. So, we’re
13:05failing to build enough overall, and
13:07we’re especially failing to build the
13:09type of housing that adds density where
13:11it’s often needed most.
13:12It really paints a picture of a
13:14structural failure on the supply side,
13:16doesn’t it? Okay, so in this
13:17environment, tight supply now, not
13:20enough being built for the future. Who’s
13:22actually managing to buy? Who’s getting
13:24the finance? Investors or first home
13:27buyers?
13:27Looking at the latest finance data,
13:29which covers the June quarter, it seems
13:30investors were really driving the
13:32increase in new home loans. The volume
13:35of new loans to investors went up 3.5%
13:37over the quarter. Compare that to owner
13:39occupiers where loan volume only
13:41rose.9%.
13:43So investors were much more active in
13:44taking out new loans during that period.
13:46They’re clearly seeing opportunity in
13:48this market momentum we’ve discussed.
13:50Yes. And that’s reflected in their
13:51overall share of borrowing too.
13:53Investors now account for 37.7%
13:56of the total value of new housing loans.
13:59That’s quite an elevated share compared
14:01to historical averages. And guess where
14:04that investor activity is most
14:05pronounced.
14:06Let me guess. WA NT Queensland. The high
14:11growth markets. spot on. That’s exactly
14:13where investors are most active
14:15proportionally. They seem to be chasing
14:17those strong capital gains and maybe
14:19lower vacancy rates in the tightest
14:21markets. They’re capitalizing on the
14:23scarcity.
14:24Okay, so investors are definitely back
14:25in the game. What about first home
14:27buyers? Are they being completely
14:29crowded out?
14:29Not entirely, actually. Their loan
14:31volumes did edge higher, too. Up 1.7%
14:34over the quarter. So, they are showing
14:35some resilience. And interestingly, the
14:37strongest gains for first home buyers
14:39were in Tasmania, up 15.4%. 4% and the
14:42Northern Territory up 13.6%.
14:45Ah, so maybe those earlier interest rate
14:47pauses gave some first home buyers just
14:49enough breathing room to get into
14:50markets like Tassy and the NT where
14:52perhaps the price points are a bit lower
14:54or maybe state government incentives are
14:56having a bigger impact.
14:57That seems plausible. Yeah, they’re
14:59finding pockets of opportunity even
15:01while investors are taking a larger
15:02slice of the overall pie nationally.
15:04Okay, so let’s try and pull this all
15:05together for you. If we synthesize this
15:07whole deep dive, what are the key
15:09takeaways? It feels like we’ve got a
15:11national market with pretty strong
15:13upward momentum, doesn’t it? Fueled
15:15mainly by that chronic lack of supply,
15:18but also helped by buyers having
15:20slightly better borrowing capacity than
15:22say a year ago. The overall price
15:24direction seems pretty clear, but and
15:26it’s a big butt, that national picture
15:29hides massive differences. Performance
15:31is incredibly localized. You’ve got
15:33places like Perth and Darwin just
15:34surging ahead. They’re clearly the hot
15:36spots right now for investors and anyone
15:38looking for growth. Meanwhile, other big
15:40markets like Melbourne, Canra, even
15:42Hobart, they’re still stuck below their
15:44old peaks from 2022, fighting to
15:46recover.
15:47That’s a great summary, and it leads us
15:48to that final maybe provocative thought
15:50for you, the listener. We’ve talked a
15:52lot about high investor activity chasing
15:54games, particularly in those tight
15:56markets. We’ve also talked about the
15:58consistent structural failure to build
16:00enough new homes, dwelling approvals
16:02running stubbornly below the decade
16:04average. So, the so what is really this.
16:07Given this ongoing failure to
16:09meaningfully address housing supply,
16:11what does that actually imply for the
16:12direction of house prices and rents as
16:14we head towards the end of 2025 and into
16:162026?
16:17Unless something changes dramatically
16:19and quickly on the supply front, a major
16:21unlocking of new dense housing. All the
16:24data we’ve looked at today suggests the
16:25forces pushing prices and rents up are
16:27likely to keep winning. That underlying
16:29scarcity combined with investor demand,
16:31it points towards continued upward
16:33pressure almost regardless of minor
16:34tweaks to interest rates or sentiment.
16:36That structural shortage is arguably the
16:38dominant story, the biggest risk and
16:40maybe the biggest opportunity in the
16:42Australian economy right
Herron Todd White Monthly Report
0:00Welcome to the deep dive. We’re here to
0:02extract those immediate actionable
0:03insights from well often quite dense
0:06market data. Today we are really digging
0:08into Australia’s vacant residential land
0:10market. We’re synthesizing the key
0:12trends from the sources in that
0:14September 2025 review. Our mission
0:17pretty straightforward actually. We need
0:19to get our heads around why vacant land
0:20is staying so stubbornly pricey even
0:23with all the economic pressures. And
0:25maybe more importantly figure out where
0:27things are most extreme. you know, the
0:29booming growth areas versus the spots
0:31where caution seems to be creeping in.
0:33Yeah. And if we just start with the big
0:35picture, the national context, you
0:37quickly see this isn’t resilience born
0:39from, say, optimism. It’s more like
0:41resilience born from basic math or
0:43geometry. Even the fundamental issue in
0:46Australia, and it’s been this way for a
0:47while, is this chronic structural under
0:49supply hitting persistent demand. So,
0:52what we’re really tracking here isn’t
0:53just a hot market. It’s a market defined
0:55by scarcity. And that scarcity, well,
0:57that’s the number one thing holding up
0:58these firm, often rising prices.
1:00Okay, let’s unpack that supply issue
1:02then. Because if the returns for
1:03developers look so good on paper, you’d
1:06think they’d be, I don’t know, breaking
1:07down doors to get more service lots onto
1:09the market. What’s actually stopping
1:10them,
1:11right? It’s not like they don’t want to.
1:13The barriers are systemic. It’s this
1:15tangle of planning approval processes
1:18which can be incredibly slow. Then
1:20you’ve got fragmented development
1:22systems and maybe most critically
1:24infrastructure bottlenecks. Things like
1:27water, sewer, roads. They just
1:30constantly lag behind the actual zoning
1:32and development approvals.
1:34I did see some notes in the sources
1:35about specific delays, how long
1:38developers are actually waiting for
1:39basic stuff.
1:40Exactly. Developers are reporting these
1:42extended lead times for just fundamental
1:44civil inputs. We’re talking delays in
1:47some cases of up to 6 months just for
1:50essential materials to even arrive.
1:52Six months. Wow.
1:53Yeah. And geographically this lag is
1:55really uh pronounced in southeast
1:57Queensland especially for what they call
1:59in Glogo sites those big raw chunks of
2:01land they start with.
2:02And I guess Perth too, right? Given the
2:04population boom over there.
2:05Precisely. Perth’s seeing this collision
2:07really rapid population growth hitting a
2:10serious lack of service land. And we see
2:13similar pressures building in Adelaide’s
2:15northern and southern growth areas too.
2:17Supply is just slow because the whole
2:19machine approvals infrastructure it’s
2:21running way behind the demand curve.
2:24Okay, so the supply tap is restricted.
2:26Yeah,
2:26let’s flip to the demand side. Why is
2:28the appetite from buyers still so strong
2:31even with interest rates being where
2:33they are?
2:33Well, it’s feeding on itself really.
2:35There are two huge structural drivers
2:38pushing this. Uh number one is
2:39population growth. Australia’s migration
2:41levels are still elevated, driving
2:43population growth around what, 1.7%
2:46annually. That’s a lot of people needing
2:47somewhere to live, right? And that
2:49growth immediately hits the second
2:51factor, the rental market squeeze. It is
2:53brutal out there. When you’ve got a
2:54national rental vacancy rate down around
2:561.2%, which is incredibly tight,
2:58suddenly buying land or house land
3:00package, it starts to look like the main
3:03only path to owning a home for people
3:05trying to get out of renting. And you
3:07mentioned earlier this isn’t just about
3:09those brand new estates way out in the
3:11sticks, is it?
3:12No, definitely not. Demand for infill
3:15lot, you know, sites with potential like
3:17splitter blocks in established suburbs
3:19of Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne. That’s
3:21also intense. These sites are generally
3:23tightly held, but when they do come up,
3:25they get snapped up incredibly quickly.
3:28Shows the appetites right across the
3:29board.
3:30Okay, so here’s where the market
3:31behavior gets really interesting for me.
3:33How are developers playing this? How are
3:36they capitalizing on this scarcity
3:39everyone knows about? Are they just
3:42letting prices float up or is there more
3:44strategy involved?
3:44Oh, it’s very strategic. The scarcity
3:46premium, it’s directly feeding that
3:48sustained price growth, especially you
3:50see it in Perth, Adelaide, and
3:51Queensland.
3:52They’re using a couple of tactics.
3:54First, any lots that actually have
3:56titles registered, they sell so fast
3:58they barely hit the market essentially,
3:59right? Second, and this is really key,
4:02developers are often strategically
4:04withholding titled stock. They’re
4:06waiting until the very moment of title
4:08registration to release it.
4:09Hang on. Withholding stock. Isn’t that
4:12basically managing the supply to keep
4:14prices up? Who ends up footing the bill
4:16for that kind of engineered scarcity?
4:18Well, the buyer does. Ultimately, the
4:20market does. They time the release to
4:22capture extra price growth that might
4:24happen between, say, an initial off-
4:26plan sale and the final settlement when
4:28titles are ready. This tactic reinforces
4:30that whole perception of scarcity and
4:33crucially for them it helps keep the
4:35valuations firm or growing on their
4:37remaining undeveloped land holdings.
4:39Okay, let’s pivot and focus on Sydney
4:41because that seems like the ultimate
4:43case study of this scarcity premium
4:45playing out but across just a massive
4:47range of prices.
4:48Sydney really shows the extremes. Yeah,
4:50the new green field stuff is mostly out
4:52in the northwest and southwest
4:53corridors. Places like Boxill. If you
4:55look at a specific example, uh 21 Bford
4:58Street in Boxill, it’s a 338 square
5:01meter block. Sold for $873,500
5:05back in June 2025. Now, that’s a jump of
5:0726% over just four years. Pretty
5:09significant.
5:10But even in those growth areas, I
5:11noticed the data showed some volatility,
5:13some patchiness.
5:14It did. Yeah. If you look just nearby um
5:17five Appalite Circuit in Gables,
5:19slightly bigger block, it only saw about
5:211.5% growth over 7 months. It just shows
5:25how localized factors, maybe a specific
5:27land release nearby or a delay in local
5:29infrastructure can temporarily cool
5:32things off even when the bigger trend is
5:34upwards.
5:34Now, what about the areas driven more by
5:37I suppose relative affordability
5:39like the southwest growth area, SWGA
5:42covering Liverpool, Campbell Town Way?
5:44Yeah, the SWGA, it’s seeing pretty solid
5:46growth, maybe 5 to 10% annually. It’s
5:49heavily driven by migration, people
5:50looking for that entry point into the
5:52market. The standout example we saw was
5:54uh 15 Fog Street in Ostrol. It’s known
5:56as probably the cheapest entry suburb in
5:58that whole corridor. That particular
6:00property showed a total increase of over
6:0216% perom over four years. Quite
6:04remarkable.
6:05And then at the complete other end of
6:06the scale, the hunt for infill sites,
6:09the knockdown rebuild, the KDR market in
6:11established suburbs where finding vacant
6:13land is like finding hens teeth.
6:15Exactly. That’s where you’re really
6:16paying for potential, aren’t you?
6:18Developers are shelling out premiums,
6:20maybe 10% to 25% extra, just for sites
6:23suitable for a duplex, like uh three
6:25Vincentia Street in Marsfield. 636
6:28square meters sold for $2.89 million.
6:30That works out to over $4,500 per square
6:33meter. They’re paying that purely for
6:34the duplex potential.
6:35And that ultimate KDR success story you
6:37mentioned.
6:38Ah, yes. 34 Glover Street, North
6:39Willoughby bought for $3.55 million.
6:42They knocked down the old house, built a
6:44new luxury home, and that new place sold
6:46for $7.21 $21 million just two years
6:48later in March 2025. It just shows the
6:51value uplift possible when you build
6:53high-end product where the land itself
6:55is the main barrier to entry.
6:56And finally, that super rare piece in
6:58Kora, just pure scarcity value.
7:00Incredible example, a near 1,200 meter
7:05vacant block on Springdale Road. Killer
7:08already had DA approval, too. Sold for
7:10$8 million this year. It tells you when
7:12supply basically hits zero in a top tier
7:15established area, the price ceiling can
7:17just disappear. So if Sydney paints that
7:21picture of scarcity across different
7:23price points, Perth right now, it’s
7:25giving us the definition of explosive
7:27price growth. It’s where supply
7:28constraints have just created this
7:30runaway market.
7:31Yeah, the numbers coming out of WA have
7:33been, frankly, staggering.
7:34They really have. The median lot price
7:36in Perth jumped something like 31% over
7:38the previous year. It hit $360,000.
7:41Supply is critically low. And
7:43underpinning that, get this, 22% of the
7:46remaining undeveloped residential land
7:47is actually constrained by environmental
7:49protections. It might never get
7:50developed.
7:51And remember that infrastructure lag we
7:52talked about in Perth. It’s not
7:54theoretical. It’s a real risk. We’ve got
7:56actual reports of builders having to use
7:58generators on site because they’re
7:59waiting for estates to get hooked up to
8:01Maine’s power. That tells you just how
8:03far behind the infrastructure delivery
8:04is compared to the sales activity. And
8:06that urgency, that pressure, it’s
8:08showing up in those extreme price jump
8:10examples, isn’t it?
8:11Absolutely. Take Yep, north of Perth, 11
8:14Kani Street, 375 square meters, sold for
8:17$320,000 in March 2025. That’s a 50%
8:22increase from what it sold for just 17
8:24months earlier. 50%.
8:26Wow. Similarly, down south in Baldivas,
8:2993 Amberly Drive, 350 m, sold Feb 2025
8:34for 330,000.
8:36That was up 47% since late 2023.
8:39It’s a market running so hot that people
8:41settling on contracts signed maybe 12
8:43months prior are finding the bank
8:45valuations are coming in higher than
8:47what they agreed to pay. Instant equity.
8:49You can almost feel the relief from
8:50those buyers. But I mean, that kind of
8:52speed also suggests pretty extreme risk
8:54for anyone buying right now, doesn’t it?
8:55Oh, absolutely. It screams immediate
8:57price risk and that infrastructure risk
8:59we mentioned. Yeah, that market feels
9:00like it’s running on pure momentum and
9:02it’s chronic chronic under supply.
9:04Okay, we’ve hit demand drivers and the
9:05scarcity premium hard. But there’s the
9:07other side of the coin, cost. How are
9:09those construction cost headwinds
9:10playing out in the more let’s say price
9:12sensitive regional markets elsewhere?
9:13Ah, yes. Construction costs, they’re the
9:16big equalizer, aren’t they? And
9:17definitely the main headwind right now.
9:19If you look at Queensland, areas in
9:21Logan City like Park Ridge, Logan
9:23Reserve, they’re still holding strong.
9:25They’re getting a fair bit of help from
9:26that $30,000 Queensland First Homeowner
9:29grant. You can still get 400 square
9:31meter lots there for around $1,000 to
9:33$1,250 per square meter. The catch,
9:36though, is that rising land prices are
9:38eating into that grant’s benefit. The
9:40total house and land package cost is
9:42getting really challenging affordability
9:44wise, even with the government help,
9:46right? The grant gets absorbed. Now,
9:48Camber seem to offer a really sharp
9:50contrast in the data. Extreme volatility
9:52almost post code by post code.
9:54Yeah, very sensitive market. Camber’s
9:55established areas, the brownfield market
9:57that remain strong, high value. But the
9:59new Greenfield areas are jumpy. McNamera
10:02saw its median price jump almost 29%.
10:04But the nearby Strathner, also
10:06Greenfield, saw its median price for a
10:08standard house block fall by 26%. It
10:11just shows how quickly buyer sentiment
10:12can turn, especially when those final
10:14construction costs are this big
10:16uncertain number hanging over
10:17everything.
10:18And we’re seeing actual cooling demand
10:20in parts of regional New South Wales,
10:22too. Places like Lismore, Shaw Haven.
10:24Yep. That’s a clear sign of cost
10:26resistance kicking in. Demand has
10:28definitely softened there. Why? Because
10:31of those ongoing high construction
10:33costs. In these areas where budgets are
10:35tighter, buyers get really wary of that
10:37scenario where the total cost land plus
10:40the build ends up being more than the
10:42finished house is actually worth on the
10:43open market.
10:44And finally, let’s touch on the Northern
10:46Territory. Alice Springs seemed like a
10:48tough market. High development costs
10:50meeting maybe shallower demand.
10:52Alice Springs really highlights how hard
10:53it is to make development stack up
10:55economically sometimes. The Kilgar stage
10:572 lots, they’re priced up to 25% higher
11:00than stage one was. But despite those
11:02high entry costs, we saw one recent
11:04resale there record a 13% drop in value
11:07over about two and a half years. Went
11:08from $179,000
11:10down to $155,000.
11:13And telling detail, the NT government’s
11:16$50,000 homegrown grant. Apparently very
11:19low takeup there suggests even big
11:21subsidies are enough to bridge that
11:22total cost gap for many buyers. So,
11:24okay, pulling it all together, what does
11:26this mean for you listening in? Well,
11:27nationally, the core story seems sound
11:29great. Demand is structurally strong.
11:31Prices are firm mainly because of that
11:32supply scarcity. But the critical
11:34pressure point, the thing to watch is
11:35definitely the historically high cost of
11:37construction.
11:38Yeah, exactly. We’ve established
11:40developers are still competing hard for
11:41subdivision sites. They seem confident
11:43they can sell the lots, but that
11:45confidence relies on the final numbers
11:47working out for the buyer. If build
11:50costs, which look like they’re
11:51stabilizing maybe, but certainly not
11:53falling significantly, mean the finished
11:56home costs more than it’s worth,
11:57especially outside the premium capital
11:59city markets, well, the whole equation
12:01starts to look shaky. The long-term
12:03health here really seems to depend on
12:05fixing those infrastructure and planning
12:07log jams we started with.
12:08Absolutely. Until Australia can
12:11genuinely speed up the delivery of
12:12service lots ready to build on, that
12:14scarcity premium is likely going to
12:16continue to dominate this market. Which
12:18brings us neatly to our final
12:20provocative thought for you to chew on.
12:23Given that we’re seeing rising
12:24construction costs, visibly dampening
12:26demand in some regional areas already.
12:29And at the same time, we know developers
12:31are using tactics like withholding
12:33titled stocks specifically to push
12:35prices higher. Is there a risk the
12:37Australian land market is creating this
12:39kind of structural disconnect? a
12:41disconnect where the scarcity premium
12:42they’re cultivating ends up pricing out
12:44the very buyers, you know, first home
12:46buyers who are supposed to soak up all
12:47the supply when the titles eventually do
12:49get registered.